Reset Password

Welcome to our new website

If you have previously had an account with us, please use the forgotten password link to reset your password here. This does not include the password for our CAT system, your existing password will still work. Thank you.

Uncategorized

Health and Safety Executive has released its annual injury and ill-health statistics for Great Britain.

HSE-logoStatistics released by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) show that Great Britain is still one of the safest places in the world to work with the lowest number of deaths on record.

However, more than half of Britain’s working days lost in 2019/20 were due to mental ill-health.

The annual report by the HSE includes statistics for work-related ill health, workplace injuries, working days lost, enforcement action taken, and the associated costs to Great Britain.

The emergence of COVID-19 as a national health issue at the end of final quarter of 2019/20 does not appear to be the main driver of changes seen in the 2019/20 data, although it is possible that COVID-19 may be a contributory factor.

HSE has been at the heart of work across government for getting Great Britain’s workplaces COVID-secure. As part of HSE’s response to COVID-19, it has continued to support the wider health response through working closely with national public health bodies, local authorities and local health teams.

Figures show that around 693,000 workers sustained non-fatal injuries in 2019/2020 and 1.6 million workers suffering from work-related ill-health.

The statistics, compiled from the Labour Force Survey (LFS) and other sources, illustrate that in Great Britain in the 2019/2020 period there were;

111 fatal injuries at work;
6 million working people suffering from a work-related illness;
8 million working days lost due to work-related illness and workplace injury;
325 cases were prosecuted and resulted in a conviction. Fines from convictions totalled £35.8 million;
In 2019/2020, the estimated economic cost to Great Britain totalled £16.2 billion with 38.8 million working days lost.
In response to the report, Sarah Newton, HSE Chair said: “The COVID-19 pandemic has focussed attention on the health and safety issues people face in the workplace. HSE remains committed to taking action where workers are not protected, to ensure the guidance and assistance we provide for employers in managing risks is the best available, based on the latest evidence and science.

“Although Great Britain continues to be up there with the safest places in the world to work, these figures highlight the scale of the challenge HSE currently faces in making Britain an even healthier and safer place to work, this includes our role in the response to the pandemic to ensure workplaces are COVID-secure.

“We must continue to drive home the importance of managing risk and promoting behaviours to ensure employers work right so that workers are able to go home healthy and safe at the end of each day.”

Uncategorized

One construction worker takes their own life every day, according to data from the Office of National Statistics (ONS), demonstrating the gravity of mental health issues within the construction industry.

The issue of mental health impacts workers in the construction industry across every level of seniority. In fact, one of the largest contributors to mental health issues experienced by construction employees is due to late payments.

A report from the Building Engineering Services Association (BESA) and Electrical Contractors Association (ECA) found that 90% of construction bosses have suffered from mental health problems as a result of late payments. This can then have a major impact on an entire workforce, impacting employees, their families and employers alike.

To understand the mental health crisis in the construction industry, this article will discuss why mental health issues are so common in the sector, what signs to look for and what improvements can be made.

What causes poor mental health within the construction industry?

Over 400,000 days of work were lost in 2017-18 because of poor mental health in construction, according to data from the Health & Safety Executive. This demonstrates that not only is the crisis having a significant impact on employees and their families but also on the UK economy as a whole.

Job security is one of the most significant causes of mental health problems within the industry. The nature of construction jobs means that often employees are working on short-term projects and are unsure of when their next job will come. This contributes to significant stressors for labourers, with a lack of uncertainty causing them to worry about how they will pay their next rent instalment or bill.

Unfair payment practices also contribute widely to mental health issues in the industry, where disagreements over quality or difficulties with resources can mean construction workers are left without full pay after finishing a job.

Since payment is often made on the completion of a project, it is easy for clients to withhold or delay payment after the job is completed to improve their own cash flow. This has meant 90% of construction bosses have suffered with mental health issues from late payments.

Signs of mental health concerns: What to look out for?
Dubbed “the silent epidemic”, the mental health crisis in construction is particularly challenging since sufferers are often reluctant to speak out about their experience. For this reason, it is crucial that coworkers and employers remain aware of the signs to look for since there are several different symptoms to spot, depending on the mental health condition in discussion.

Physical signs of mental health issues
The symptoms most easy to detect when it comes to mental health problems are those we can physically see. For employees who experience anxiety or panic disorders, this can manifest itself in panic attacks at work which are spotted with physical signs of shaking, excessive sweating and struggling to breathe.

If you are in the presence of a coworker who is experiencing a panic attack, make sure you try to stay calm and stay with them. They may have medication with them to take in these circumstances so ask them what you can do to help and look out for this. You can also guide them through breathing exercises, asking them to focus on breathing in and out slowly.

Psychological signs of mental health issues
For those mental health problems which do not produce any physical symptoms, they can be much more challenging to spot.

If one of your colleagues is crying a lot, this could be a sign that they are suffering from mental health problems. This could be a private issue or something they do not want to talk about, so make sure you are there for them but also respectful of their privacy if they do not wish to disclose any more.

Behavioural changes can also indicate psychological distress, for example, if a coworker begins to avoid social activities or interaction which they previously would have engaged with, they may be suffering from a mental health problem. You may feel comfortable speaking to your colleague about this, or may instead discuss your worries with a friendly manager or HR team member who can offer more support.

How to improve mental health in construction
Although looking out for your colleagues and employees is a fantastic place to start with tackling the mental health issues in the industry, wider initiatives are required for real change to occur.

Addressing the payment practice issue
As the research shows, unreasonable payment practices are one of the major contributing factors to the mental health crisis in the construction industry. It is imperative for clients of construction companies to adhere to the payment schedule originally discussed, if all targets and deadlines have been met, to avoid placing unnecessary stress on the shoulders of construction managers.

Discussing mental health openly
With the correct company culture, mental health problems can be recognised and prevented more effectively. Employers should work to create a space where their team feels comfortable speaking about their mental health.

This could be through talks, events and a specialised wellbeing programme, giving employees a positive and transparent company culture where they feel able to open up about any struggles they are having. This, in turn, will allow for a real change to occur across the industry, with the support of all parties involved.

Source

Uncategorized

Construction sites without the correct protection can potentially be very dangerous places, especially when it comes to head injuries.

Headway, the brain injury association and safety manufacturer Centurion are working together to raise awareness of using and maintaining hard hats while on site.

The organisations have joined forces to create Hard Hat Awareness Week which runs from 21-27 September.

Hard Hat Awareness Week will see a series of activities designed to drive awareness of brain injury and encourage best practice around safety equipment.

 

The results of a survey conducted by Headway which explored the use of hard hats in the construction industry and understanding of concussion were published at the start of the awareness raising week.

Statistics revealed that among those who experienced a head injury at work:

  • 52% did not report an incident to their manager
  • Just 6% sought medical attention for their head injury.

More worryingly, 15% of 486 respondents stored their hard hat in an unsuitable way, such as in direct sunlight or extreme temperatures, whilst 58% painted, marked or applied decals or labels to their helmet which could cause a chemical attack and reduce its durability.

24% were unaware that exceeding the expiry date of a hard hat can reduce the level of protectivity and 28% did not know where to find their helmet’s expiry date or were unaware it even had one.

‘Always wear your hard hat’

Peter McCabe, chief executive of Headway, said: “Brain injury is more common than you think, and its impact can be life-changing for both the injured person but also their wider family. Ensuring your head protection is worn and cared for correctly is key to remaining safe.

“To all those working on site or in the construction industry, we urge you to always wear your hard hat.”

Chris Tidy from Centurion Safety Products, added: “We want people to understand the devastating effects of brain injury. It’s not just the individual that’s impacted, a brain injury can change the lives and futures of partners, family members and friends.

“Centurion and Headway want to drive the awareness of brain injury but also help wearers of safety helmets and hard hats to understand the possibly lifesaving piece of PPE they are wearing.

“We would like a week dedicated every year going forward for all wearers to audit their safety helmet or hard hat for signs of wear and tear, make sure it is in date, remove any unchecked stickers and sanitise/clean this piece of safety equipment whilst in a safe environment.

“We would like to challenge other safety helmet manufacturers to get involved and publicise this event going forward.

“We also want wearers to understand that 30% of head injuries occur from slips, trips and falls from the same level where the wearer could suffer a rotational injury.

“We would like to educate the wearer on the risk of concussion and give them a concussion recognition tool that will help them to understand the early warning signs, showing the person may be at risk so they can seek medical attention.”

Headway and Centurion are holding a Hard Hat Awareness Week raffle, the proceeds of which will go towards helping Headway deliver its frontline services and improve life after brain injury.

source

Uncategorized

Three construction firms have been fined a total of £256,000 after an employee died during a demolition.

David Shayler was struck on the head by a stack of tiles at a site on the Isle of Wight, on 13 October 2016.

The 53-year-old was removing roof timbers by hand with a colleague in preparation for a development project. A gable wall partially collapsed, causing him to fall backwards.

Portsmouth Crown Court was told that the work was inadequately planned and managed by all of the dutyholders involved in the project.

Health and Safety Executive (HSE) investigators found that the roof timbers were removed out of sequence, and the brick gable had been left unstable. Inadequate provision was made to prevent falls from height, despite concerns raised by workers in the days leading up to the incident.

THE RISK OF UNINTENDED STRUCTURAL COLLAPSE IS WELL KNOWN WITHIN THE INDUSTRY

David's employer, Ryde Demolition, admitted two breaches of section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work Act and was fined £80,000 and plus costs of £12,132.

HJ Bennett pleaded guilty to breaching two counts of section 3(1) of the Health and Safety at Work Act for failing to ensure the safety of non-employees. It was £120,000 plus costs of £12,057.

Stoneham Construction admitted breaching Regulation 13(1) of the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015. It was fined £56,667 and ordered to pay costs of £12,004.

HSE inspector Dominic Goacher said the father-of-two's death was 'wholly avoidable' and caused by the companies’ failure to implement safe systems of work.

'Demolition is a high-risk activity whose safe execution is complex and technical and where expertise is vital,' he added. 'The risk of unintended structural collapse is well known within the industry. Demolition requires careful planning and execution by contractors who are competent in the full range of demolition techniques.'

Source

Uncategorized

Measures to prevent falling from or through the roof were missing

A logistics company has been fined £80,000 after failing to provide fall protection for workers replacing the roof of its Blackburn premises in May 2019.

Blackpool Magistrates heard how HSE inspectors visited the warehouse and observed two workers on the roof without any physical protection or any work equipment in place to prevent or minimise the distance of a fall.

Further investigation revealed that the roof of the warehouse was fragile and people were at risk of falling through the structure.

The defendant did not have measures in place to prevent workers falling from or through the roof from which they could suffer personal injury or even death.

Working beneath roof using MEWP required

The removal of tiles should have been carried out from underneath the roof using a scissor lift or a cherry picker.

Scaffolding should have been in place to create a barrier against and to minimise the distance of a possible fall.

  • Speed Drop Logistics Ltd – of Manner Sutton Street, Blackburn, pleaded guilty to breaching Regulation 6(3) of the Work at Height Regulations 2005. The company was fined £80,000 and ordered to pay costs of £1570.60.

Speaking after the hearing, HSE inspector Stuart Hadfield, said:

“Falls from height remain one of the most common causes of work-related fatalities in this country and the risks associated with working at height are well known.

Companies should be aware that HSE will not hesitate to take appropriate enforcement action against those that fall below the required standard.”

Source

Uncategorized

Incorrectly fitted RPE will not protect the wearer from dangers to health
HSE is advising healthcare workers currently using respiratory protective equipment (RPE) on the importance of ensuring that RPE is fitted correctly.

A respirator that is incorrectly fitted will not protect the wearer.

Fit Test – RPE suitability
Tight-fitting respirators rely on having a good seal with the wearer’s face. It is vital that before using a respirator for the first time, or before using a different brand of respirator, wearers pass a fit test for the model and size of respirator they are going to use. This is to make sure the equipment fits to their particular facial characteristics.

In these unprecedented times, to protect front line health care workers and reduce the risk of transmission during the coronavirus outbreak, if support is required in carrying out fit test. This test should be done following government advice on social distancing.

This means making sure instructions are delivered verbally and observations are made from a distance of two metres (6ft) where possible. If closer observation is required, those being fitted should keep their respirator on to minimise the risk of transmission.

Fit Check – RPE worn correctly
Once the wearer has been fit tested for the model of respirator they intend to use, they must ensure they have put it on correctly to protect themselves and others. Wearers should follow three simple steps: R-P-E

Read the guidance
HSE has step-by-step guidance on the correct way to fit the respirator and carry out a fit check. Wearers must familiarise themselves with the guidance and follow the manufacturer’s instructions when fitting their equipment.

Put your respirator on using a mirror
When fitting a respirator, wearers must make sure the straps are in the correct place and are not twisted or crossed over. The easiest way to do this is using a mirror.

Ensure your own safety
Dr David Fishwick, Chief Medical Adviser for HSE and respiratory physician said:

“Before entering the workplace, wearers must carry out a fit check to ensure their respirator is on correctly. This allows the wearer to check they are experiencing no leakage around the face seal, and that they have put the respirator on correctly.”

Andrew Curran, Chief Scientific Adviser for HSE said:

“Ensuring RPE is put on correctly is crucial. Any gaps between the wearer’s face and the mask face seal, whether through incorrect moulding of the nose clip or by facial hair, will compromise the protection of the wearer. Users must ensure they have been fit tested for the size and model of respirator they are going to use, and that they carry out a fit check each time RPE is used.

Source

Find out more about our Face Fit services and Respitory training courses.

Uncategorized

Total Access recently displayed at Hillhead 2016 where we made many useful contacts. One of the contacts asked if we had any old rope for the Scarecrow display in the Hope valley. We obliged with some lengths of rope and here is the outcome.

 

Scarecrow version of Cliffhanger. 

Uncategorized

Dear Distributors

The implementation of our new ERP beginning of Year 2016, is a great opportunity to improve our product manufacturing traceability. As a consequence, the codification of the individual serial number is going to evolve on our PPE.

 

1-Starting from January 4th 2016, two types of codification will coexist:

Individual serial number Type B:

 

This New codification will be deployed to approximately 90% of our PPE. The concerned PPE are:

PPE manufactured by Petzl in France and by our subcontractor in Romania: Concerned PPE care all the PPE that are not concerned by the Type A serial number as described above. In January 4th 2016, we will stop to mark these PPE with the old codification (Type A), and switch the marking to the New codification (Type B).

 

Note that after January 4th, for these PPE, we will have in our warehouse in Crolles the actual codification (Type A) and the new one (Type B). As a consequence, for all these PPE, starting from January 4th, you and your customer will be delivered with a mix of the actual codification (type A) and the new codification (Type B).

(the new codification applied to 90% of Petzl PPE)

The third digit of this new codification is going to be a letter that indicate the month of manufacturing. A=January, B= February, C= March,… L= December)

 Batch number issued from SAP is included in this new codification. This batch number give us access to all manufacturing data’s, including workers and quality final inspector names. This will give to Petzl a faster and more precise access to all manufacturing data’s.

 

 Individual serial number Type A:

This codification is the actual codification applied to 99% of our PPE. It will remain to approximately 10% to 15% of our PPE. The concerned PPE, are:

PPE manufactured by Petzl in Malaysia (Petzl Manufacturing Malaysia). Concerned PPE are: all sport harnesses + some sling. PMM will move to SAP in Year 2017, as a consequence, the codification of all the PPE manufactured in PMM will evolve to type B in Year 2017.

 

PPE manufactured by an external supplier (METEOR, SIROCCO, REVERSO,VERSO, FREINO, VERTIGO, OMNI, Quick links, etc…). As our suppliers do not have SAP, the codification will remain as today, and as long as the product is manufactured in their facility.

(the new codification applied to 10% of Petzl PPE)

2-Communication to our customers:

 

Pro & Sport Newsletters: An information will be included in the next Pro & Sport Newsletters sent to all customers including end users  When = Mid-January to March 2016

 

Petzl website www.petzl.com :

 

  • FAQ: They will post a new after sales service FAQ to explain this change (see FAQ in Annex of this letter): When =January 4th 2016 for the English version.

 

  • Product page: A link will be posted on each product page, just below the link of the Tech Notice: When = Mid-January 2016

 

  • PPE inspection procedure: All of them will be updated to present this change: When=31st January 2016

 

  • IFU: They will not be updated before a technical evolution of the PPE. Consequently, it will take us 3 to 4 years to update all IFU.

 

  • Pro website only: A slider will be visible in order to alert end users on this change.When= Mid-January 2016

 

Uncategorized

The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) has today informed Foodles Production (UK) Ltd that it will be prosecuted over an incident in which actor Harrison Ford was seriously injured during the filming of Star Wars: The Forces Awakens.

Foodles Production (UK) Ltd is based in Queen Caroline Street, London, and will appear at High Wycombe Magistrates Court on 12 May 2016 to face four charges.

Mr Ford suffered a broken leg and other injuries when he was struck by a heavy hydraulic metal door on the set of the Millennium Falcon. The incident happened on 12 June 2014 at Pinewood Studios.

A spokesman for HSE said:

“HSE has today informed Foodles Production (UK) Ltd that it will be prosecuted over four alleged breaches of health and safety law. The charges relate to an incident during filming of Star Wars Episode VII: The Force Awakens, which left Harrison Ford with serious injuries after he was hit by a heavy hydraulic door.

“By law, employers must take reasonable steps to protect workers – this is as true on a film set as a factory floor. We have investigated thoroughly and believe that we have sufficient evidence to bring the case to court.”

Foodles Production (UK) Ltd is the company responsible for producing Star Wars VII: The Force Awakens and under health and safety law for managing the risks created during production.

Notes to Editors

  1. The four alleged breaches are:

     

  2. Now that criminal proceedings have commenced your attention is drawn to the fact that the provisions of the Contempt of Court Act apply to this matter. You will understand that it is not appropriate for HSE to give media interviews until court proceedings are concluded.
  3.  You are advised to check the time and date of the hearing with the Court nearer the time to ensure that the case has not been put back.
  4.  The Code for Crown Prosecutors link to external website sets out the principles for prosecutors to follow when they make enforcement decisions. HSE’s approach to prosecutions is set out in its enforcement policy statement.

(source)

Uncategorized

Three companies have been fined a total of £90,000 after a worker was seriously injured when he fell nearly six metres from a platform with unguarded rails.

Southwark Crown Court heard that on 4 March 2013 two workers accessed the top level of a unit which was to be dismantled as part of construction work at a site in Westferry Road, London.

One of the workers slipped and fell over the side of the platform, hitting the wall and then landing on the concrete floor 5.9 metres below. He sustained multiple injuries including internal bleeding, a collapsed lung, and fractures to his pelvis and right arm and has been left unable to work.

Meta Management Services Limited (trading as Aktrion), of Rutland Court, Edinburgh, who was the principal contractor for the project, pleaded guilty to a breach of Regulation 22(1)(c) of the Construction, Design and Management Regulations 2007 and was fined £9,000 with £1,942 in costs.

Goss Graphic Systems Limited of Beech House, The Oaks Business Park, Longridge Road, Preston, pleaded guilty to a breach of Regulation 13(2) of the Construction, Design and Management Regulations 2007, and Regulation 4 of the Working at Height Regulation 2005 and was fined a total of £27,000 with costs of £7,000.

Beck and Pollitzer Engineering Limited of Burnham Road, Dartford, Kent pleaded guilty to a breach of Regulation 4 of the Working at Height Regulation 2005 and was fined £54,000 with costs of £14,000.

Notes to editors:

  1. The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) is Britain’s national regulator for workplace health and safety. It aims to reduce work-related death, injury and ill health. It does so through research, information and advice, promoting training; new or revised regulations and codes of practice, and working with local authority partners by inspection, investigation and enforcement. hse.gov.uk
  2. More about the legislation referred to in this case can be found at: legislation.gov.uk/ link to external website
  3. HSE news releases are available at http://press.hse.gov.uk

Media contacts

Journalists should approach HSE press office with any queries on regional press releases.

 

Guardrails

 
Our range of collective fall protection measures include guardrails these are designed to completely remove the risk of a fall from height and comply with all relevant British and European standards.

 

Our Guardrail has been specifically designed to provide permanent edge protection where regular access for maintenance and inspections is required.  The system's design provides permanent edge protection without the need to mechanically fix the system through the roofing membrane or building's structure.

fixed versa rail guardrail for help or advice about fixed guardrails

 

Working at Height & Rescue Equipment

Total Access (UK) Limited has established an enviable reputation for being the leading independent supplier of working at height equipment.  We have built our business on a reputation for gaining a clear understanding of our customers’ requirements and providing them with excellent technical advice/back up whatever their problem. 

 

As a totally independent supplier of over 17 brands, Total Access (UK) Limited has a large selection of products to offer our clients whatever their remit be it comfort, weight, adjustability, flexibility, price, technical specification or advice and support.

 

Fall Arrest Blocks

Fall arrest blocks can also be known as: retractable fall arrest blocks, fall arrest devices, fall arresters, inertia blocks, inertia reels, retractable type fall arresters, retractable lanyards, self-retracting lanyards & “sala blocks”.
What does a Fall Arrest Block do?

 

In the event of a fall the braking mechanism on the drum holding the rope or webbing (that is attached to the users harness) is engaged and arrests the fall.

All self-retracting fall arrest blocks are designed for use in vertical / near vertical applications, & some have also been tested and approved for use in other applications, for example horizontally (such as a fall off a flat roof) where the classification / type of edge is also detailed (for example a smooth edge as small as 0.5mm radius).

for help or advice abotu PPE or fall arrest equipment call us